In modern America, there is the official stance on issues and all other opinions are “misinformation.” For those who propagate “misinformation,” we are entering a dangerous time, with a growing movement created to destroy the lives of those who are not “correct.”

Nick Cohen, a British columnist, called for the immediate freeze of Rupert Murdoch’s assets. Cohen argued that Murdoch’s “Fox News presenters and Russia’s propagandists are so intermeshed that separating the two is as impossible as unbaking a cake.”

The columnist pointed to the examples of Tucker Carlson and RT as “ideologues” that regurgitate Kremlin talking points.

Cohen accused Carlson of being Russia’s favorite “quisling” and pushing “out Russian propaganda lines.” He even argued that in the US “there  remains a market for Putinism among a large minority of Republican voters.”

He cited Republicans’ “yearning for dictatorship” and “hatred of liberals in power is deeper” as signs of their illiberal tendencies that supposedly make them receptive to Russia and its geopolitical agenda.

On top of that, Cohen accused Murdoch of “boosting Russian morale and, conversely, undermining Ukrainian resolve by supplying a dictatorship with foreign validation.”

To address the perceived problem of Russian disinformation, Cohen alluded to the “UK’s sanctions regulations” that involve the British government’s ability to freeze an oligarch’s assets for allegedly “obtaining a benefit from or supporting the Government of Russia.”

Similarly, Cohen called attention to how the “Biden White House promises to punish those ‘responsible for providing the support necessary to underpin Putin’s war on Ukraine.’” Cohen contends that “On both interpretations, there is a plausible prosecution case for freezing the assets of Murdoch’s NewsCorp.”

What Cohen is calling for here is not only an assault on free speech but also constitutes a major violation of property rights. One need not be a fan of Murdoch to recognize the dangerous precedent Cohen’s proposal would set.

What’s to prevent other wealthy people who potentially hold views contrary to the regime from being persecuted in the future?

Moreover, Cohen’s disdain for dissent is telling. Tucker Carlson is not even advocating for Russian strongman Vladimir Putin. His position is one of strict non-intervention in a conflict that advances no pressing interest.

All told, Cohen and his neocon ilk don’t care for any narratives that go against the establishment’s prevailing discourse. The Russia-Ukraine conflict has been a mask off moment for the neocon crowd now that they’re frantically calling for flagrant violations of human freedoms to make it easier to wage their proxy crusade against Russia.

Wars are notorious for creating anti-liberty environments where political opportunists take advantage of the hysteria to promote despotic measures and curtail people’s freedoms. Right-wing populists must stand against calls to escalate tensions in Eastern Europe and not let the country’s traditional liberties go down the drain during a time of geopolitical crisis.