May 29, 2023

3 thoughts on “SCOTUS Nominee Explains Why Child Pornographers Deserve Lighter Sentences

  1. Was the pervert disseminating the material or using it only for his personal pleasure. It he was disseminating the material, this judge(?) and any other judge(?) that would not punish the pervert to the full extent of the law is guilty of malfeasance of office. If, on the other hand, the sick pervert was using the material solely for personal pleasure and this was his first indictment, then a 5 year probation conditioned by psychiatric treatment for at minimum of two years with the patient responsible for the cost of the treatment would seem appropriate. Personally, it seems that going after the end user, whether pornography or drugs is not the proper approach. While I do believe in the right of free speech, I do not consider pornography in any form to be free speech. Yet, even Disney and Michelle Obama produced and endorsed pornographic dancing by pre-puberty girls. But, I guess if it is socially acceptable to murder an innocent infant in the womb, pornography and video violence are only child’s play. As a society, we are doomed if we continue with the direction the justice system has been headed.

  2. IS THIS WOMAN NUTS?? Pornography AND PEDOPHILIA is “O.K. ?”Maybe” BESTIALITY” is next. HOW LEFT CAN “THE LEFT” GO? Let’s “go” to “CATHOLIC” Pelosi to EXPLAIN THIS!

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: