Ketanji Brown Jackson Has History of Protecting Child Predators
President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was picked by Biden solely because of the color of her skin, has a shocking and disturbing history of apologizing for child predators on the bench.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) wrote a Twitter thread sharing what his office has discovered about her record with regards to protecting the victimizers of children, and it is beyond disgraceful.
“I’ve been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches. I’ve noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children,” Hawley wrote.
“Judge Jackson has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker. She’s been advocating for it since law school. This goes beyond “soft on crime.” I’m concerned that this a record that endangers our children,” he added.
Hawley showed quotes from Jackson that highlighted her dangerous far-left ideology that coddles predators and provides them with undeserved leniency after committing despicable acts to children.
“In the current climate of fear, hatred, and revenge associated with the release of convicted sex criminals, courts must be especially attentive to legislative enactments that “use public health and safety rhetoric to justify procedures that are, in essence, punishment and detention.” Judges should abandon the prevention/punishment analyses that rely on legislative intent…and that assess the “excessiveness” of a sex offender statute’s punitive effects in favor of a more principled approach to characterization,” Jackson wrote.
In another opinion, Jackson claimed there may be a “less-serious child pornography offender” whose motivation for collecting child pornography is not of a sexual nature but rather due to “the challenge, or to use the technology,” whatever that is supposed to mean.
“I’m wondering whether you could say that there is a – that there could be a less-serious child pornography offender who is engaging in the type of contact in the group experience level because their motivation is the challenge, or to use the technology? They’re very sophisticated technologically, but they aren’t necessarily that interested in the child pornography piece of it?” she said.
Additionally, Jackson said while serving on the U.S. Sentencing Commission that she “mistakenly assumed that child pornography offenders are pedophiles” and she wanted “to understand this category of nonpedophiles who obtain child pornography.”
Hawley pointed to other cases like United States v. Hawkins where Jackson gave an adult convicted of possessing child porn only three months in jail when the sentencing guidelines called for the predator to receive 10 years behind bars. He also pointed to six other cases where Jackson reduced recommended sentences for various child predators.
The full Twitter thread posted by Hawley can be accessed here. He noted that the system is attempting to obscure Jackson’s full record in order to protect her during her upcoming confirmation as a Supreme Court Justice.
“So far, the Sentencing Commission has refused to turn over all Judge Jackson’s records from her time there. In light of what we have learned, this stonewalling must end. We must get access to all relevant records,” Hawley said.
The fact that someone as unqualified and dangerous as Jackson is being considered for the nation’s high court is proof that diversity is not a strength and that multiculturalism necessarily means the death of decency, honor and civilization.
1 thought on “Ketanji Brown Jackson Has History of Protecting Child Predators”
I am less concerned with Ms. Jackson’s professional background than I am with Mr. Biden’s racist and sexist actions in eliminating all of the potential candidates for this Supreme Court position that were neither Black nor female. Half of this once-great nation is male, and all but 13% of it is not Black. Mr. Biden effectively eliminated over three-quarters of the potential new Justices with his decision to ignore every judge in this nation except Black women. Statistically, several of these ignored people could have been a better Justice than Ms. Jackson.